The Chains We Forge
Itās the way that Iām drawn to it that bugs me.
Like the damn thing is a talisman.
Like I canāt bear to be without it. (Because maybe I canāt?)
Itās not just annoying, itās insufferableāthe anxiety, I mean. The twinge of unease that flares up when my phone isnāt near and Iām forced to brave the contours of my own wild mind.
Am I addicted?
It sure feels like it.
Hooked on the most socially accepted drug in the world: my phone.
āI keep my hand in,ā Mr. Harrigan said.
Yes. Donāt we all.
And thatās the problem, isnāt it?āwe canāt help ourselves.
Which is why Iām going to sing the praises of āMr. Harriganās Phoneā by Stephen King for a minute. Itās a simple novella, liable to be overlooked in Kingās vast canon; as cozy and heart-warming a ghost story as youāre likely to find. Yet even if āMr. Harriganās Phoneā is never spoken of in the same reverent tones as classics like āThe Mist,ā āThe Body,ā or āRita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption,ā it nevertheless delivers a haunting vision of our technological dependence well worth remarking upon.
And given where we find ourselves in this cultural momentāwhen so much of how we think, view, and feel about the world is framed by devices, apps, and algorithmsāits message feels especially pertinent.
Recapping the Story (Warning: Spoilers Ahead)
The story begins in 2004, in (the fictional town of) Harlow, Maine. Nine-year-old Craig lives alone with his widowed father. One Sunday after reading a lengthyāand challengingāBible verse at church, Craig is offered a job by Mr. Harrigan, Harlowās resident eccentric billionaire. The job is simple: read aloud to the old man. Easy work, even if the pay is modest, so Craig accepts. Over time, the pair form a unique bond and grow to cherish each other.
Each year, Harrigan sends Craig four scratch tickets in recognition of a job well done. When Craig hits the jackpotāwinning $3000āhe uses part of the prize money to buy Harrigan a first-gen iPhone as a token of his appreciation. Harrigan is skeptical to the point of revulsion at first, that is, until he learns how the device can benefit his financial dealings. Soon, heās hooked.
When Harrigan dies some time later, Craig, grieving, slips the phone into his old friendās jacket pocket before the burial, a memento of their friendship for Harrigan to take with him into the afterlife. Later that night, Craig calls him up to hear his old friendās voice one last time. He leaves an appreciative voicemail as a final goodbye.
But something strange happens.
The next morning, Craig discovers a cryptic message sent from Harriganās number in reply to his call. Evidence, perhaps, of a lingering connection beyond the grave. Stranger still: when Craig phones Harrigan again, this time to confide about his ongoing difficulty with a school bully, the bully is later found dead.
The cycle repeats years later when Craig calls Harrigan again to lament the light penalty given to the drunk driver responsible for killing his favourite high school teacher. A disturbing pattern has now emerged. Each time Craig confides in Harrigan about a problemāwhose phone battery should have run out a long, long time agoāthe person responsible for his troubles winds up dead.
Fearing that heās preventing Harriganās soul from moving on (and perhaps degrading his own by proxy), Craig decides to let go of his old friend. So he tosses his old iPhoneāhis connection to Harriganās vengeful ghostāinto a watery quarry, closing the circle. But try as he might, Craig canāt bring himself to ditch his current phone, even after everything heās experienced.
āIn the twenty-first century, I think our phones are how we are wedded to the world. If so, itās probably a bad marriage.ā
Ghost Story⦠Or Dire Warning?
I read āMr. Harriganās Phoneā as a warningāstark, urgent, all too easy to ignore.
As I mentioned, Harrigan is quite reluctant to accept the gift when Craig first offers him the phone. I picture him looking like Bilbo when the old hobbit sees the Ring for the last time: terrified by the objectās power, yet unable to resist its seductive call.
His explanation is unforgettable:
āā¦Thoreau said that we donāt own things; things own us. Every new object⦠is something more we must carry on our backs. It makes me think of Jacob Marley telling Scrooge, āThese are the chains I forged in life.ā⦠If I had that [iPhone], I would use it.ā
Heās right, isnāt he?
We have our phones, and so we use them.
But at what cost?
We are, all of us, modern-day Fausts. And we sold our souls to a charismatic devil dressed in blue jeans, frameless glasses, and a suave turtleneck.
For I suspect that you must feel it, tooāthat unease I mentioned earlier; the sense that your phone is as much a burden as it is a boon.
⦠Or am I wrong, and has your life improved immeasurably since you first adopted it?
Link By Link
So yes: I think weāre forging our chains right now.
With every swipe.
With every click.
With every scroll.
That itch to pick it up? That compulsion to fill every silence with noise, noise, and more noise? Thatās what Harrigan was talking about. What Thoreau foresaw.
The smartphone isnāt a mere convenience⦠itās a link in the chain we use to bind ourselves.
Leave it to Stephen King to see it all so clearly (and to render those hard truths in such beautiful prose). The man certainly knows a thing or two about the territory. Heās no stranger to addiction himself; heās well-acquainted with its shape, its cost, its seductive allure.
Weāll continue to explore these themes next week, in Part Two, but for now, letās establish this:
King isnāt just telling a spooky little tale here.
Heās documenting our fall from grace.
Itās not death we should fearā
No. Itās the chains we forge in life.




I actually saw the film version of this story and couldn't believe it is not better known. The last scene lingers in my mind to this day. A worthy subject to examine!
Wow this was powerfully confronting. I look forward to part two! I couldnāt read this fast enoughā¦so good.